What the early days of the Internet can teach us about Blockchain

It’s been said that history doesn’t repeat itself but it often rhymes. That’s why so many pundits are drawing parallels between the (r)evolutionary paths of Blockchain and Internet technology. My personal experience tells me there are indeed similarities – and striking differences. Back in the mid-1980s, I had the good fortune to have a front

It’s been said that history doesn’t repeat itself but it often rhymes. That’s why so many pundits are drawing parallels between the (r)evolutionary paths of Blockchain and Internet technology.

My personal experience tells me there are indeed similarities – and striking differences. Back in the mid-1980s, I had the good fortune to have a front row seat at IBM during the early development of the backbone of the Internet. And, I am lucky to be leading a team that is helping set the strategic course for Blockchain-inspired technology innovation here at Intuit.

Memories of the early days of the Internet came rushing back recently during the TTI/Vanguard conference in San Francisco when Leonard Kleinrock delivered the opening keynote. A member of the Internet Hall of Fame and recipient of the National Medal of Science and Charles Stark Draper Prize, Dr. Kleinrock pioneered the theory behind the foundational technology of packet switching that led to the Internet.  More personally, he was also a great inspiration to me, from my PhD dissertation and building on his work to my early days at IBM’s Thomas J. Watson Research Center.  During the conference, he and I had a chance discuss and agree on parallels between the Internet and Blockchain.

It was at T.J. Watson in the mid-1980s that I joined a team created by the National Science Foundation to upgrade the backbone for the NSFNET network, a precursor to today’s private sector networks. Created by the NSF as an open, public version of the Department of Defense’s ARPANET, NSFNET had been crushed by exponential traffic growth, ultimately making it virtually unusable. Working together, IBM, MCI, and the MERIT Networks consortium of Michigan Universities accomplished a 800-fold upgrade from 56 kbps to T3(45 Mbps) , removing this critical constraint and allowing the commercial Internet to flourish.

As I reflect on this formative period of the Internet, I’m struck by the familiar sound of today’s Blockchain conversation, as industry observers hail a revolutionary advance based on an open, decentralized architecture. As with the Internet, there’s tremendous optimism about Blockchain’s considerable promise, as well as considerable hype about its seemingly imminent and ubiquitous impact on modern life. And as with the Internet, much of this breathless enthusiasm is justified—in spirit, at least.

But there are also significant differences. Unlike Blockchain, the Internet was developed through an altruistic, industry-wide collaboration of smart people solving problems together. It was only through these efforts that we were able to overcome the fragmentation, instability, and inefficiencies that had plagued the Internet’s non-standardized predecessor networks. In today’s frenzied Blockchain world, there’s no such grand collaboration on the horizon. This has major implications for the road ahead.

So, what will the future of Blockchain look like? Based on my experiences in the early days of the Internet, I’ll offer these three bold predictions for its evolution and timeline.

Prediction 1: A usable, scalable, global Blockchain is at least a decade away

This prediction will come as a disappointment to the many enthusiasts who want to see Blockchain change the world overnight, but it’s a recognition of two important challenges that currently impede that goal: a lack of standards and a technology that for now remains immature.

The rapidly expanding Blockchain sector encompasses hundreds of open source and proprietary interpretations based on varying coding languages, protocols, consensus mechanisms, and privacy measures. To date, these versions are typically unable to interact or interoperate without translation—greatly undermining efficiency and reliability. Companies are rightly wary of building business around technologies that have yet to be standardized; a converged set of global standards will be critical to widespread Blockchain adoption, commercialization, and integration. This standardization could be either official or de facto; ad hoc organizations are already working to create standard versions of Blockchain and developing technologies such as the Interledger protocol to enable payments between different distributed ledger networks.

Massive adoption will also depend on solving engineering and design issues around the usability of Blockchain and its related infrastructure. Scalability is a crucial factor. As a Blockchain grows, its rising consumption of storage, bandwidth, and compute can create bottlenecks. If only a few nodes are powerful enough to process a block, we could also see the emergence of centralization, eroding the decentralized architecture that ensures the security of the system. The impregnability of Blockchain has all too readily been taken up as an article of faith; sober due diligence remains essential.

Prediction 2: Having reached the top of the hype cycle in 2018, we’re now entering a prolonged phase of real innovation

The breathless hype around Blockchain has brought an inevitable backlash as disappointing experiments and implementations lead to slowed investment and failed technology providers. In its July 2018 Hype Cycle for Blockchain Technologies, Gartner reported that “Blockchain technical capabilities are evolving, but fail to match the extreme hype and are not yet sufficient for mission-critical enterprise use. Blockchain-inspired solutions lead enterprise conversations. The market will traverse the Trough of Disillusionment before significant value is realized.”

This is a familiar situation for many technologies—including many which have survived to become enterprise mainstays. Indeed, in Gartner’s model, the trough of disillusionment can be followed by the “Slope of Enlightenment” and reach a “Plateau of Productivity.” As portents of doom scare away speculators and dampen expectations, companies will pull back from frivolous investment and force a real focus on customer problems to ensure market viability. This is a crucial aspect of Blockchain’s evolution.

Prediction 3: Blockchain-inspired technology will simplify the lives of small businesses, accountants, and consumers in 3 – 5 years

As Blockchain completes its slog through the Trough of Disillusionment and enters the Plateau of Productivity, we’ll begin to see products and services that validate the enthusiasm and excitement that greeted Blockchain’s emergence. This will be through bits and pieces of technologies inspired by Blockchain. Two areas of particular interest to consumers and small businesses are shared transactions and financial identity.

Consider the way real estate transactions are handled today. When a buyer is ready to close on a home, funds for the purchase are placed in trust with a middleman such as a bank, incurring a third-party fee and delaying the close. With Blockchain, the parties can make this exchange directly, over the Internet, in a secure and trusted way, without additional cost or delay leveraging pieces of Blockchain technology Similarly, small businesses can reduce friction by sharing information in a more secure and trusted way with new suppliers or financers, and protect themselves against fraudulent transactions and breach of contract.

Blockchain-inspired technology can also be used to safeguard individuals’ financial identities through the use of strong Blockchains for authentication and reconciliation – even before the industry arrives at a global standard. Already, this problem is being solved in a fragmented way around the world – and here at Intuit. In the coming years, encrypted digital identities will replace multiple usernames and passwords, making security experiences both more convenient and more effective. The creation of a self-sovereign identity, fully controlled and personally maintained by the individual, will provide far greater protection against identity theft than traditional identity management systems.

Bullish on Blockchain

All in all, Intuit is excited about Blockchain-inspired technology and eager to bring its transformative benefits to small businesses, accountants and consumers. Industry hype and disillusionment aside, Blockchain technology has the potential to make digital life more seamless, secure, and efficient, a vision that’s well-aligned with our company’s mission to power prosperity.

Our strategy is to understand, experiment, and innovate its key technologies, eventually adopt it in key products, and leverage it to build a thriving, frictionless ecosystem for our customers and partners.

Stay tuned.

Written by Bharath Kadaba

Bharath Kadaba is Senior Vice President and Chief Innovation Officer at Intuit, and leads the Technology Futures group. His organization is responsible for creating game-changing technology in support of Intuit’s mission to power prosperity for consumer, small business and self-employed customers.

Since joining the company in 2008, Bharath has served in a variety of executive leadership positions. Prior to his current role, he was Vice President and Engineering Fellow with responsibility for leading engineering teams that built innovative new technology for the company’s QuickBooks, TurboTax and Mint product lines. Before that, he led advanced technology development as Vice President for Global Ready Offerings, and Vice President for the Global Business Division, Product Development, respectively.

Before Intuit, Bharath was Vice President of Media Engineering at Yahoo, where he led the development of a shared services platform to serve as the foundation for all media properties (news, finance, sports, games, etc.) and significantly expanded the U.S. media product capabilities. Prior to Yahoo, he was an executive with Siebel Systems, AristaSoft, and News Corp., after spending 15 years at IBM and IBM’s TJ Watson Labs.

Bharath earned a Ph.D. in Computer Networks from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, and a BSEE and Master’s in Computers and Control from the Indian Institute of Science.